Poking Holes

Posted: July 12th, 2013 | Author: | Filed under: Philadelphia Eagles | 33 Comments »

I don’t mind national writers being critical of the Eagles. I just don’t think they do a very good job of it. So, I’ll do it for them. Here is a negative outlook on things.

* * *

In 10 days, Eagles rookies will report for Training Camp. Optimism is high. New coach Chip Kelly brought enthusiasm and excitement to an organization that had grown stale. Free agency and the draft went well. The Eagles added some talented pieces. Life is good.

All that will change when Training Camp gets underway. Optimism will get a Deacon Jones head slap from harsh reality. While the team’s QB competition will make for great media fodder and fan discussion, it doesn’t make for good football. Mike Vick is on the downside of his career. He had a chance to force the Eagles to cut him so he could hit the open market. Instead, Vick chose to re-do his deal for average money and to compete with a couple of young QBs. Nick Foles went 1-5  as a starter in 2012 and lacks special physical skills. Matt Barkley had a disappointing Senior season at USC and the team went just 7-4 in his starts. You can argue that the focus shouldn’t be who will be the choice at QB, but rather…are there any good choices at QB? Just because there will be a winner of the competition doesn’t mean he will win games.

LeSean McCoy got his huge payday last summer and delivered a whopping 2 rushing TDs. He’s had some questionable off-field issues since then and it is fair to wonder if the big contract has brought out the worst in him. His backup is Bryce Brown. The whole world got caught up in his amazing first couple of starts since Brown posted freakish numbers. Unfortunately those teams had severely banged up defenses and Brown came back to Earth very quickly after that. He was a fumbling machine and that’s a major issue for the new coaches to try to fix.

Whoever wins the QB battle will have plenty of good targets to throw the ball to. The Eagles have several talented receivers and tight ends. The question is how they fit in the Chip Kelly offense. Kelly says wide receivers must block to play for him. DeSean Jackson lacks the size to be a good blocker. Jeremy Maclin just doesn’t seem very interested in it. There are big receivers in Riley Cooper, Arrelious Benn and Ifeanyi Momah. Forget big…are any of them good? Tight end should be a strength. That group is talented, deep and versatile.

Injuries ruined the O-line in 2012, but the group should be much better this year. Jason Peters looks all the way back at LT. Evan Mathis has become one of the best LGs in the league. That side of the line should be outstanding. Things are more iffy beyond that. Center Jason Kelce is coming off a torn ACL. His game is based on athleticism, but that might be affected by the injury. How effective will a less athletic Jason Kelce be? Todd Herremans moves to RG, a position he hasn’t played. Rookie Lane Johnson takes over at RT. He’s got all the talent in the world, but don’t forget that just a few years ago he was a bad junior college QB. The change on  the right side of the line takes on extra importance if Vick is the QB. That would be his blindside.

The Eagles were 15th in the NFL in yards last year. Even with awful blocking and erratic QB play, the team could move the ball. There were 2 huge problems. Turnovers killed the team and Red Zone struggles were almost as bad. Kelly will focus on fixing these areas. Still, it is fair to question how well he will solve them since a veteran coach like Andy Reid wasn’t able to do it.

Trying to get a read on the Eagles defense is hard. Over the course of the final 10 games in 2012. the defense was awful. Not just bad, but truly awful. They got immediately better when Kelly hired Bill Davis, a man without a sterling track record. He is the team’s first real defensive coordinator since Sean McDermott was fired in January of 2011. The fact that Davis improves things should tell you just how bad the situation was.

Davis and Kelly don’t want to commit to a scheme. They will mix the 4-3, 3-4 and some hybrid looks. That sounds great in theory, but it is fair to raise the question…if the Eagles struggled to do one thing (the 4-3) well the last couple of years, how are they going to master a variety of looks and fronts?

There is talent in the front seven, but the Eagles lack a stud player that teams must gameplan around. Fletcher Cox might emerge in that role this year, but he’s going to be adjusting to a new position and there is no guarantee that he’ll make that leap. Trent Cole is coming off his worst season in the NFL and is moving to OLB. It is hard to get optimistic about that. Connor Barwin could be a good SAM, but he struggled to get to the QB last year. It’s hard to think that will change since he’s now playing in a tougher division.

Depth at linebacker is a concern. We don’t know what will happen if DeMeco Ryans gets hurt, but I can tell you that the answer isn’t good. Barwin might be the most irreplaceable of the Eagles. Do you want Cole or Brandon Graham dealing with TEs in coverage?

The Eagles defense was 29th in points allowed last year. They only had 30 sacks and 8 INTs all year long. This is a far cry from the Buddy Ryan days when the defense might produce 60 sacks and 25 INTs.

There are going to be 3 new starters in the secondary. Unless Kenny Phillips beats out Nate Allen. Then we will have an entirely new set of starting DBs. What could go wrong there? The secondary will be a better group of players in 2013, but with so many new faces there will be some problems. DBs must be cohesive. They must communicate and work well together in order to pull off complex coverages successfully. There is no doubt the secondary will be tougher in 2013, but there are likely to be some coverage mistakes as the players get used to each other and the new system.

The 2013 Eagles have too much talent to be considered a bad team, but they don’t have enough talent to be considered a top-notch group. It really feels like this team’s success will be determined by the QB and coach. That could turn out to be a good thing, but could also prove to be a major issue.

The old saying in football is that if you have 2 QBs you have no QBs, meaning that if it isn’t clear who your best player is that you don’t have a good QB. The Eagles have 3 QBs. I don’t know what that means, but it isn’t good. Can one of these guys emerge and prove to be an effective starter? That’s what Kelly needs for the Eagles to be a winning team.

As for Kelly, he is a huge question mark. He has never played or coached in the NFL. Think about his competition. Mike Shanahan and Tom Coughlin have each won a pair of Super Bowls. Jason Garrett played on Super Bowl teams. These men know the NFL and what it is like to be part of a championship team. Kelly built Oregon into a dominant program, but he wasn’t coaching against men that were on the same level as him (or smarter). How will Kelly adjust to this?

There is no question that the changes he has made so far are bringing some excitement to the organization, but the novelty will wear off soon enough and Kelly’s ideas will be judged on their merit. Andy Reid started 0-4. Ray Rhodes started 1-3. If Kelly gets off to a similar start, expect to start hearing some sniping from the locker room, mostly from players who Kelly has benched or taken playing time away from. College football coaches can be dictators. NFL coaches have to get along with their players due to salaries, signing bonuses and the salary cap.

Things got away from Reid at the end of his time in Philly. It was time for a change. Any new coach was going to offer short term improvement, but Kelly must prove during the season that he’s cut out for the NFL and is the right coach to lead 53 men on the quest for a Super Bowl.

The 2013 Eagles could go from worst to first,but you sure wouldn’t want to bet on that. Just too many questions.

_


  • Andrew J. Race

    Tommy, I noticed a typo…You say here Todd Herremans has never played right guard…I presume this was a minor oversight as Todd was an effective right guard in the Jon Runyan days

  • Guest

    im sorry im wrong….Todd was Left Guard

    • TommyLawlor

      No problem. Thought maybe I was crazy for a second.

  • zbone95

    I was reading one of Sheils articles, (http://www.phillymag.com/eagles/2013/07/11/applying-smart-football-concepts-to-the-eagles/) and there was an interesting quote from Arellious Benn. When asked how much the option routes will be incorprated, he said that its majority of plays. Built into their offense. So is it expected that there will be a lot of incompletions, interceptions, early on ? Qb being on the same page as WR will be little hard. I remember you said that Foles ran some option back in Arizona? That should give him a little advantage I guess.

    • RIP Worms

      Whoa, creepy. Great minds, zbone95…

    • TommyLawlor

      Yeah, option routes are going to be tough on QBs and WRs. I covered this a couple of months back.

      http://igglesblitz.com/2013/05/option-routes-and-other-stuff/

      • Mitchell

        As far as option routes go, can a qb be less than stellar but have a great connection with receivers and be stellar? In other words, can option routes make up for a lack in a qbs and receivers physical skills?

    • Anders

      Think of Eli Manning in terms of how dumb he can sometimes look when the less experienced WRs does not see the same as him (one reason Cruz is so deadly is that he is almost telepathic with Eli in how they see the openings in defenses)

  • RIP Worms

    I think the toughest adjustment on either side of the ball will be the new (and apparently heavy) emphasis on option routes. We saw Eli throw some head-scratching picks esp. in 2010 (I think) due to option routes.

    I’m dreading the national outcry among the media and casual fans when our QBs start throwing the ball straight to defenders because the WR and QB each read the play differently. Getting on the same page with your receivers is something that takes time and repetition.

    I’d put the over/under for INT after four games at 7 with at least 3 or 4 picks due to mis-reads of option routes. On the bright side, I expect that number will drop significantly by the last four games.

    In the meantime, it will be painful to watch and even more painful to have to listen to the uninformed opinions of the Jamie Dukeses of the world.

    • Mac

      So wait, you’re telling me that installing lots of option routes and not having a designated number one qb to take the majority of the reps and develop chemistry this summer is going to be a problem?

      • Neil

        The more mistakes, the more to learn from!

    • Tom33

      7 picks in 4 games? I think it was 6 after 2 games last year, so really not that bad, right? :)

      • RIP Worms

        Ha! True enough. I’m hoping CK’s emphasis on minimizing turnovers and favoring quick passes vs. vertical routes will limit that number. Plus, regression to the mean should be working in our favor this year (across the board, really).

  • ACViking

    Re: How Have Eagles Coaches Have Started in Y-1?

    T-Law:

    You covered the last two: AR began 0-4 and RR went 1-3.

    Here’s every Eagles coach’s start beginning with the last title winner, Buck Shaw:

    1. Buck Shaw ’58: 1-4 / two seasons later he’s 10-2, NFL champ, and he retires.

    2. Nick Skorich ’61: 7-1 / fired two years later after going 2-10-2.

    3. Joe Kuharich ’64: 2-2 / fired four years alter after going 2-12.

    4. Jerry Williams ’69: 1-4 / fired 1.2 seasons later after starting 1971 0-3.

    5. Ed Kuyhat ’71: 2-2-1 / finishes ’71 by going 6-3-1, but fired after ’72′s 2-11-1.

    6. Mike McCormack ’73: 1-4-1 / fired two seasons later after going 4-10.

    7. Dick Vermeil ’76: 2-2; loses 8 of next 10. Wins NFC in 1980, retires after ’82.

    8. Marion Campbell ’83: 4-2, loses 9 of next 10. Fired two years later.

    9. Buddy Ryan ’86: 1-3 (added 25 new players — nearly 50% turnover). Fired after ’90 for winning only in the regular season.

    10. Rich Kotite ’91: 3-1 followed by 4 straight losses behind QBs Pat Ryan and Brad Goebel. He should have been fired right then and there!

  • Mac

    As excited as I am about our new corners (who know how to tackle) I feel as though I’ve been overlooking the fact that our Defensive Backfield has never played together… ever. Now, the chemistry these guys will have certainly can’t be any worse than the 3rd grade level finger pointing sessions and ball room dancing that we became accustomed to seeing last year, but we need to expect growing pains as these DB adjust to the new scheme and playing together. The first quarter of the season could be rough, especially playing week 1 vs an RGIII who is likely to be ready to prove something.

  • Tom33

    I am actually very optimistic about the Eagles this year, however, I think there is one more thing you could add to the list – Leadership on the field. I think it was one of the key elements that was missing the past 2 years and a big reason why things seemed to go from bad to worse. If you look at the key vets on this team – Vick, McCoy, DJax, even Peters – they all seem to be lacking something in the area of maturity or judgment. Even Trent Cole disappeared last year, although he was likely caught up in the soap opera known as D-Line meetings. I’m hoping that Ryans can add something (especially since it is year 2 with the team), but I don’t think any of the other guys they brought in address this area of need. I’m hoping I’m wrong here, but I just don’t see the Dawkins, Runyon, Thomas, Trotter personalities on the roster.

    • Neil

      I remember talk in 2010 or thereabouts of Cole not being much of a leader when he was unanimously our best defensive player. Which wouldn’t have been a problem if we had someone else to fulfill that role. I don’t think he really disappeared last year

      I think now Demeco can be our defense’s field general. Is he gonna be good enough by himself? Difficult to tell. Maybe giving playcalling to Kendricks will energise him to grow into that role too.

    • Mitchell

      I think since so much of the defense is new, Ryans and Kendricks shouldn’t have a hard time becoming leaders. I can see how it might be difficult if all the guys on defense were on the team for a long time but this unit is either very young, new to the team, or both. Who knows maybe Nate Allen can emerge as not only a good play this year but a leader as well. Fingers crossed.

  • Brad Tessler

    Thanks for the uplifting post right before the weekend.

    I think there is enough talent for us to be a very good running team. Solid OL, multiple backs, plenty of TEs, a deep threat to keep the DBs honest.

    I agree the defense is a tricky prospect. But relative to last year, mediocrity would be an improvement.

    Lastly, I saw your blog post about Chad. I think he is wearing 97 in the video because that is the year he graduated. Sorry to burst your bubble.

  • Ark87

    That’s an impressive article. I don’t think there is an equal to it available. Truth is, most people are either gung-ho with optimism or down on the team for ignorant or over-simplified reasons.

    As an eagle’s fan, this article sums my outlook up pretty well. My optimism comes in the sense that there are sooooo many unknowns, 1 or 2 pleasant surprises and we could be good enough to win the division.

  • pjxii

    Tommy, all very valid points but I just can’t help but wonder if MÖrton would have written this what kind of responses he would have gotten.

    Btw, where did he go? I felt that he brought a well-thought-out analysis of the teams weakness with his posts (must like your write-up).

    • TommyLawlor

      We all miss Morton.

      • TheRogerPodacter

        most of the time he came across as a crazy person, but every once in a while would have a perfectly good (albeit pretty negative) point of view on something.

        its good to have people that don’t just blindly agree with everything you say haha

        • Mac

          I agree 10000% with this post!

          • TommyLawlor

            I disagree, but only 237%.

          • atb124

            You’re both wrong.

          • A_T_G

            I agree with everything said here.

  • Mitchell

    Sometimes as fans we get too caught up in optimism. I know I am one of them especially being relatively new to football. It is easy to get caught up in the hype or vise versa. However, this article gives us, as fans, a much needed reality check and perhaps, allows us to move into the season with optimism but also a sense of caution.

  • Tumtum

    Too many good points. I don’t like it.

  • Daniel Norman Richwine

    You are such a good writer, but you have only half a metaphor goining here. Try “The Norm Snead of optimism will meet the Deacon Jones sack of reality.”

  • Pingback: How Much of A Loser Will Chip Kelly Be?

  • Pingback: maillot river plate 2013