Denied!!!
Posted: February 4th, 2017 | Author: Tommy Lawlor | Filed under: Philadelphia Eagles | 239 Comments »Dawk did not get into the Hall of Fame today.
Nor did TO.
Voters did elect this group.
Your Pro Football Hall of Fame class of 2017. pic.twitter.com/PKDgdQK5b6
— SportsCenter (@SportsCenter) February 5, 2017
I can live with those guys making it, but Morten Andersen? A kicker? That stings, to put it mildly.
He was a great kicker in his era, but his numbers pale in comparison to today’s kickers. And it isn’t like Andersen was some great postseason kicker. I could see Adam Vinatieri making it because of all his amazing clutch kicks. Andersen played for 26 years and does hold some NFL records (most career FGs made), but putting him in over a dominant position player seems silly.
Some people were upset with the choice of Jason Taylor. I think he is one of the best DEs I ever saw play so I can live with that. He wasn’t on great teams, but posted very good career numbers.
Dawk is a special player and deserved to make it.
Here's a list of every player in NFL history with 25 interceptions, 25 sacks and 25 forced fumbles:
Brian Dawkins.
— Reuben Frank (@RoobCSN) February 4, 2017
That’s pretty incredible.
I think a couple of things worked against Dawk. First, he never won a Super Bowl. Fair or not, that is important for making it in.
He wasn’t part of a great defense. The Eagles never finished first overall in yards or points allowed in his career. They were second a few times, but that’s not the same. As a LB or DB, it helps a lot for you to be on a great unit. You can glance at Taylor’s sack totals and see when he had big seasons. Dawk never had more than 4 INTs or 3.5 sacks in a season. There is no “wow” year for him statistically.
It may take a year, two or even more, but Dawk should get in. He did have a great career.
I thought TO had a real chance to make it in. He is being punished for his erratic behavior off the field. Owens deserves to be in, but I’m not going to feel sorry for the guy. He is paying the price for his own behavior. If he hadn’t been such a jerk over the years, he’d already be wearing a gold jacket.
In a way, this is fair punishment by the Football Gods. I think Donovan McNabb had a real chance to make the Hall of Fame. He finished 2nd in the NFL in MVP voting in 2000. He threw 25 TD passes in 2001 and almost got his team to the Super Bowl. Injuries slowed him the next 2 years, but McNabb and Owens did team to lead the Eagles to the SB in 2004. McNabb threw 31 TD passes and played really well. At that point, McNabb was on track to make it to Canton.
Then TO went TO. He split the locker room and forever eroded the relationship between McNabb and his teammates. McNabb never threw for more than 23 TDs in the rest of his career. He never ran for 250 yards in a season. TO got in his head and never left.
If TO hadn’t gone nuclear on McNabb and the Eagles, who knows how things might have gone. The team might have made it back to the Super Bowl in the ensuing years and both those guys might be in Canton. Maybe not, but those guys made a dynamic duo in 2004. They could have been special if they played together for several years.
The Eagles are undoubtedly the ultimate “What If” team.
*****
Anyone who voted for Morten Andersen over Brian Dawkins should just lose their vote. It's laughable. https://t.co/4JOHxSxboe
— Jimmy Kempski (@JimmyKempski) February 5, 2017
Hall of Fame voting should be public. I'd LOVE to hear the justification for Morten Andersen over Brian Dawkins.
— Jimmy Kempski (@JimmyKempski) February 5, 2017
The Eagles' headline for the Dawk not making the HOF "Simply Ridiculous". Good for them.
— Greg Richards (@igglesnut) February 5, 2017
Brian Dawkins not making the Hall of Fame is bullshit.
— Brandon Lee Gowton (@BrandonGowton) February 5, 2017
Dawk would not approve of that language, BLG. But yeah…you’re right.
Brian Dawkins flew all the way to Houston to find out he didn't make the HOF. "It's disappointing. I'm not going to lie to you,'' he said.
— Paul Domowitch (@pdomo) February 5, 2017
More Dawk: "But it won't last. I'll get this out of me quick. I'll get back to grinding like I was grinding and trying to help the Eagles.''
— Paul Domowitch (@pdomo) February 5, 2017
_
1 QB
The best Dawk hit is when he ended Ike Hilliard.
I remember that play and it was awesome, however, that didn’t derail Donte’s career, it was the torn ACL that did it for him.
I agree with you but that hit broke his morale and his attitude changed after that he didn’t run the same. Put fear in him. He was the biggest fastest strongest player in the NFL the time but his attitude changed after that hit
[…] Tommy Lawlor Dawk did not get into the Hall of Fame today. Nor did TO. Voters did elect this group. Your Pro […]
Take Jerruh Jones out and put Dawk in. That’s fair, right?
I’m sorry Tommy, but there is no justifying Dawkins and Owens not getting in. This makes the Hall of Fame look like a complete joke.
Cowboys coach for coach of the year. Dak for rookie of the year? Insult to injury. Dak’s numbers were crazy though.
Game manager
Every year they have to come up with some kind of false narrative in order to avoid giving COTY to Belichik. Its laughable. It is like he broke the system and now they just have to pretend that he doesnt exist in order to make it fair for the rest. Dan Quin, by the way, should be up there too. Screw the cowboys.
Did some quick research:
— Only 73 of the 310 HOFers were elected their first year of eligibility (less than 25%).
— Dawk was in the Top 10, so he just missed out (the other 4 that just missed were Tony Boselli, Ty Law, John Lynch and Kevin Mawae).
So while disappointed, I’m confident he’ll get in next year.
Now, on the other hand, TO wasn’t even in the Top 10 – he was dropped in the first cut, so he was in the 11-15 group – and this was his second year of eligibility. Plus Randy Moss becomes eligible next year. Uh-oh, TO.
According to the HoF committee, kickers are more important than safeties. The league is obviously behind the times since they don’t draft kickers in the first anymore (RIP Al Davis)!
LT was going to be an unanimous first ballot guy. Dawkins were way more deserving of being a first ballot HoF than Taylor. I don’t think Taylor should have been a first ballot guy, there’s going to be at least 5 guys that will pass him in the sack numbers by the end of their career, Warner and TD are controversial guys, but both guys deserved to get in eventually. Warner is one of the best playoff QBs of all time, turned around two franchises out of three and was close to winning 3 Super Bowls. TD would have had the stats and the ring if he could have stayed healthy. However, what ifs shouldn’t have made up for the fact that it never happened.
I know I’m late, but TD does have the rings, 2 of them.
To all of the HOF voters who put in Taylor (deserved it, but not over Dawk), Andersen (deserved it, but not over Dawk), Davis (didn’t deserve it), and Warner (didn’t deserve it and one of the dumbest beings alive) over Dawk:
F U!
Taylor isn’t as high on the all time list of best DEs are Dawk would be for safeties. Taylor isn’t as high on the list of best DEs of he era as Dawk would be for safeties.
Andersen was a great kicker for his era, so I almost understand it.
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/leaders/rush_yds_career.htm
Terrell Davis is 55th on the career rushing list. He’s one spot below Chris Warren and and spot above Mike Pruitt. I’m really happy Bronco fans cried Davis into the HOF.
Kurt Warner, in addition to be a fan fiction spouting moron, is 39th on the career passing total list. Right behind Jay Cutler. That’s certainly impressive. Kurt Warner is 60th all time in wins. Right in between such world beaters as Jim McMahon and Chris Chandler.
There isn’t any specific reason that Dawkins should have been named on the first ballot, but he was better than 4 of the 5 folks enshrined.
TO being left off was a joke. Faneca, Jacoby, and Mawee would also have been fine to have seen included.
I’m just mega-insulted by Davis and Warner.
Problem the Hall of fame has now is that so many ‘good’ not great RB’s are already in the hall that when you compare Davis to other RB’s already in the Hall he actually has a compelling case.
Posted this yesterday but this is the list of RB’s who have gone into the hall since the last pure safety: Dickerson, Marcus Allen, Sanders, Thurman Thomas, Emmit Smith, Faulk, Curtis Martin, Bettis, Davis, Tomlinson.
Some of those guys were the best in their generation… others not so much.
The only bad admit on that list is Bettis. But all of those guys have better career totals than Davis. He pulled the bar downwards.
Bettis is like top 10 all time in rushing yards and TDs, albeit with a pretty low YPC and low receiving yards even for the era.
Its not ludacris to put him in the Hall when he has a ring, a couple of all pros and a Man of the Year award.
When you use yards from scrimmage, a much better accounting of any RB’s contribution from the 70s forward, Bettis falls far below the other guys on that HOF list.
Look at Bettis from a pro bowls, yards from scrimmage, total TDs, yards per carry, and average season standpoint vs. Ricky Watters, Edge James, Warrick Dunn, and Tiki Barber. He fits in with that group; and not at the top of it.
His ring is 100% irrelevant; as that is a team accomplishment and he was a specialty down substitute on that team.
Bettis is in the HOF due to a nickname and an overly generous accounting of Pittsburgh players by the HOF voters.
Here are the RB numbers
Ricky Watters – 10 seasons, 5 pro bowls, 14891 from scrimmage, 91 TDs, average year 1489 yards 9.1 TDs
Bettis – 13 season, 6 pro bowls, 2 all pro, 15111 from scrimmage, 94 TDs, average year 1162 yards, 7.2 TDs
Edge – 10 years, 4 pro bowls, 1 all pro, 15610 from scrimmage, 91 TDs, average year 1561 yards, 9.1 TDs
Tiki – 10 years, 3 pro bowls, 1 all pro, 15632 from scrimmage, 67 TDs, average year 1563 yards, 6.7 TDs
Dunn – 12 years, 3 pro bowls, 15306 from scrimmage, 64 TDs, average year 1275 yards, 5.3 TDs
____________________________________________________________________________________
Tomlinson – 11 years, 5 pro bowls, 3 all pro , 18,456 yards from scrimmage, 162 TDs, average year 1678 yards, 14.7 TDs
Martin – 11 years, 5 pro bowls, 1 all pro, 17430 from scrimmage, 100 TDs, average year 1584 yards, 9.1 TDs
Faulk – 12 years, 7 pro bowls, 3 all pro, 19154 from scrimmage, 136 TDs, average year 1586 yards, 11.3 TDs
—————————————————————————————————————————————
Tomlinson – 11 years, 5 pro bowls, 3 all pro , 18,456 yards from scrimmage, 162 TDs, average year 1678 yards, 14.7 TDs
Smith – 15 years, 8 pro bowls, 4 all pro, 21579 from scrimmage, 175 TDs, average year 1439 yards, 11.7 TDs
Sanders – 10 years, 10 pro bowls, 6 all pro, 18190 from scrimmage, 109 TDs, average year 1819 yards, 10.9 TDs
Payton – 13 years, 9 pro bowl, 5 all pro, 21264 from scrimmage, 125 TDs, average year 1635 yards, 9.6 TDs
Thank you! While everyone is justifiably up in arms over Morten Anderson, I am floored by Terrell Davis. That guy had 3 amazing years, that’s it! He was either pedestrian or hurt every other season of his short career. Kurt Warner led the Greatest Show on Turf and won a SB. He played in 3, yet for most of his career he was just bad. Remember him on the Giants? He had 3 great years, that’s it. I remember Artis Hicks owning Jason Taylor in a Monday Night game. Artis Hicks, people! Again, he was a good player but I would have never considered him for the HOF. Then there is Kenny Easley. All this talk about safeties but Kenny Easley was a safety. He did not even touch Dawk. What a joke.
HOF = career excellence.
Career excellence = strong career totals vs. other guys at your position and multiple years of being in the top group of players at your position.
That’s my HOF criteria when awarding the excellence of individual players.
Think there is a narrative, impact component that needs to be added to the consideration for the Hall. It is more than career longevity and raw counting stats and allpro nods. The question is could you tell the story of the NFL without needing to talk about that player.
Take Warner – he was not a great career QB, but he not only is an background amazing story, but QB’d the greatest show on turf, one of the greatest offences in NFL history, that changed the NFL and offence expectations moving forward and won a championship.
Then at the end of his career when over 40 he was the leading part of one of the greatest Cinderella stories is recent NFL history.
That narrative component, if placed in the wrong hands, can create a false impression of a player’s overall excellence without using the stats first.
Warner, his personal narrative, etc. do nothing for me.
This is what no one gets about the Hall of Fame. That was a very good way to put it. Could you tell the story of the NFL without needing to talk about that player? That’s completely accurate and that’s how the voters view it.
Still that explains Kurt Warren and maybe TD as well. Still at a loss with Ken Easley and Mort. Figured you could do an NFL 75 seasons like documentary without bringing them into the conversation.
And, let’s be honest…Davis only really had one AMAZING year. He had two other really good years. Rushing for 1700 or even 1500 yards like he did the two years prior to his 2k season is nothing to scoff at. But, 1538 yards like he had in 1996, thats good for the 70th best rushing total in a season ever. Good, but I don’t know if that’s AMAZING.
Im extremely biased as a Dane but Morten Andersen is one of the greatest kickers in NFL history and like Dawk has been disrespected because of his position. He deserved to be in the Hall, even though it sucks that it was on behalf of Dawk.
Talk to any player, coach, scout or GM from the era about kicking and you’ll find out how extremely well respected Andersen was and in how high regards actual NFL people held him. Even though its very easy to look up career percentages and deem him useless and credit all of his many, many, many, many, many kicking records to the pure volume of his kicks because of his insanely long career.
An additional complaint about the “logic” used by HOF voters.
If football is the ultimate team game and a Super Bowl victory is the culmination of the ultimate team effort; why the F are Super Bowls erroneously used as a HOF measuring stick? Super Bowl titles, for anything other than a head coach or greatest team of all time discussions, are the ULTIMATE cherry picked data point.
And I reserve the right to bludgeon any person who uses that lack of a Super Bowl title to rip the Eagles or their players at any point. Immediate invitation to a critical condition.
I find the Pro Football Hall of Fame voter’s preference on winning the Superbowl for it’s members no different than the Heisman Trophy, which should be renamed “The Quarterback or Running Back on the #1 or #2 Team in the Nation Trophy”.
Agreed.
It’s dumb, but the truth is it’s the hall of FAME, not the hall of the best football players. How famous the players are, how memorable they are, how quintessential they were to big moments in NFL history matters to the hall of FAME.
There should really be 2 football Hall of Fames. The Best Football Players Hall of Fame with zero consideration taken unit account on winning a Superbowl, and the Guys that Were on a Winning Superbowl Team Hall for Fame.
Kurt Warner, Terrel Davis, and eventually, Eli Manning, are/will only be in the Hall of Fame because they won the Superbowl. What’s most important in the voters eyes is if a player’s team won their last three of four games in at least one year of their playing career.
What are the odds Dawkins has to wait until Ed Reed, Troy Polamalu, and Lynch get in? I understand Reed, but Troy and Lynch both have Superbowl wins and Dawkins doesn’t so voters will heavily skew that in their favor.
Reed was a better player than Dawk. Reed is 2nd only to Lott all time with excellence at safety.
Polamalu and Lynch aren’t fit to eat Dawk’s fromunda cheese on a stale ritz cracker.
Rod Woodson was pretty impactful as well, and while he played a lot of corner, Charles Woodson was incredible too. I do feel like Dawk was the better physical presence and overall better runstopper without sacrificing coverage abilities, and not leaving much behind in the playmaking department although Rod, Charles and Reed almost doubles Dawks interceptions. To be fair, Woodson times 2 can also hang with Dawks FF, FR and sack numbers.
Rod Woodson did become a first ballot Hall of Famer, Ed Reed will probably do the same. Charles Woodson should probably do the same, but I dont know if he will.
Rodney Harrison has great stats, very similar to Dawk, but lacking tremendously in the turnover department compared, especially FF and FR. Polumalu has a huge name, which is actually kinda odd considering his stats aren’t THAT great. Obviously a great player and its not like he has no numbers to back him up, but not comparable to Dawk. John Lynch is similar to Rodney Harrison, just with slightly lower numbers, albeit I feel like he was the best run stopper of all the mentioned.
Dawkins belongs in the hall and anything else would be criminal. He probably belongs in as a first ballot, but the thing is that theres so many good players, not only at his position, but at other more valued positions, and while Dawk is one of the biggest names in Philly sports history, he apparently doesn’t have the national name of the guaranteed first ballot guys like Ray Lewis or Brian Urlacher and some of the offensive players. Honestly, Dawkins might end up having to wait which is beyond disrespectful taking into account his leadership and being an overall great human being.
Good names. I’d still put Dawk over Charles Woodson and half of Rod’s career was at CB, so he’s a tad different.
Yeah, both Woodsons had loads of snaps as corners which bump up their INTs. They’re both great players though, and their respective fanbase might put them over Dawk and we couldn’t really be mad at that.
The fact that Rod was first ballot should really make the case for Dawk as one too though, but in the end it depends on the class.
Reed was a better ball hawk. Dawk was better at everything else.
I’ll ride or die all day with Dawk, but I consider Reed a transcendent player. I screamed some extremely foul language at the top of my lungs when the Ravens stole Reed two picks in front of us in 2002’s draft. Could you imagine this team with Reed and Dawk long term?
I thought Reed was better too but when I see the stats, not so much. He was definitely more of a ball hawk but Dawkins has twice the tackles, 4x the sacks, and 3x the FF. All around, at least statistically, Dawk was better. Regardless, he is not competing against Reed this year which is why this is a travesty.
Reed was AMAZING at 1 thing. Off the charts amazing at that one thing. Dawkins was better than almost everyone else at every other part of the job except the one area Reed blows everyone out of the water in.
I don’t know that Reed was the better player, you can make the argument certainly, but I think Dawk was a more complete player. Dawk could cover the slot, come down and be the 8th man in the box, rush the passer, AND play center field. Reed was your classic deep man and excellent at what he was asked to do, but Dawk could do it all.
Exactly. Reed was the best centerfielder of all time. No question. But, he also ONLY did that one thing. Dawk could do things that Reed could never have dreamed of.
Crazy talk. Polamalu dominated games at his peak.
ov-er-rat-ed
frequently missed tackles due to running 100 mph with a bad angle and was often toasted in coverage. Typical Pittsburgh fluff job.
I’m not saying he’s not a HOF player, but Dawk if FAR superior.
Ah finally someone sees Polamalu as overrated. Pass coverage was bad. Was a flying missle mahority of the game making fans go ooh ahh n thinking he was the best.
This dishonors the hall of fame more than it does Dawk.
Plus the continued exclusion of TO.
The only knock on his stats is that both him and Moss were pretty low reception wise, which is ridiculous when they’re both top 15 with TO in top 5. And even more ridiculous when they’re 2 and 3 in yards and touchdowns solely behind Jerry Rice who is literally in the conversation as the GOAT of all time similar and has stats that like Gretzky probably won’t be broken.
Shouldn’t that count as a PRO of TO and Moss? That they needed fewer receptions to put up numbers? Its just plain wrong, theres no discussion.
Im actually really interested to see if they put in Moss the first time or they screw him too.
Yeah, the WR order has been criminal.
I’m legitimately not sure they dont screw Moss too. Its not like he was completely without controversy and we know they dont like putting in guys without rings.
If the 2 guys who actually lead the NFL when you discount the freak of nature that is Jerry Rice, can’t get in first ballot, then the system is fucked up.
I’d actually rather see them narrow down the list position by position of anyone deserving of the hall of fame. If theres nobody at a position, no-one gets in. If theres one, that guy gets in. If theres more, a committee puts in the best one. Maybe you can have a wildcard or 2 in case you end up with a situation like Brady and Manning retiring at the same time and both of them obviously being first ballot HoF.
I know the Pro Bowl voting is almost as flawed as HOF voting but when the disparity is this large, something is wrong:
Pro Bowls:
Brian Dawkins – 9
Jason Taylor – 6
Terrell Davis – 3!!!!
Kurt Warner – 4
Morten Anderson – 3!!!
Kenny Easley – 4
LT – 5 (and I am not arguing this one)
He just does not have the ring…but neither does LT, Jason Taylor, Morten Anderson, or Kenny Easley.
The flaw in the pro bowl voting is that too many guys make it. So if you’re not making it; that’s not the “flaw!”
I know its not everything but Andersen made two all decade teams
Just for giggles
Player A – 2001- 2169 from scrimmage / 10 TD, 2002 – 2287 / 24. 2003 – 2110 / 27. 2004 (in 8 games) 1079 / 15.
Player B – 1995 -1485 / 8. 1996 – 1845 / 15. 1997 – 2037 / 15. 1998 – 2225 / 23.
Player A is Priest Holmes. Player B is Terrell Davis.
Anybody want to honestly make a case that Priest Homes’s 4* (3.5 actually) year run of 7645 yards from scrimmage / 76 TD is any better or worse than Davis going 7592 / 61 TDs?
Exactly neither belong in the hall. Davis had the benefit of being on the “it” team of the late 90’s that got all the NFL Films coverage and made it to the Super Bowl in back to back years. That’s the only difference.
Davis also joined the media after retirement and made a lot of friends. He seems like the ultimate good guy who the media gives a break because they all know him. If Davis took the Marvin Harrison stance of avoiding the media at all costs, I doubt he gets in.
I think the Marvin Harrison stance of murdering a guy in Philadelphia is gonna work against him just as much as his media silence
Marvin was inducted into the HOF last year.
I don’t understand Terrell Davis and Kurt Warner making it in. Davis and Warner had great seasons in the NFL and super bowl wins, but they don’t have the careers that others have had. I get that they’re really good players in those years, but Hall of Fame worthy?
I have no argument against LT or even Taylor really. Morten Andersen…just…what?
TD and KW were probably the best players in the NFL at their height. Quality vs quantity argument.
Morten Andersen… quantity vs quality? A retro pick? don’t know anything about kickers myself.
I can accept that argument for TD. I don’t think I can with Warner. He was VERY good when he was at his best, but I still don’t think he’s Hall worthy.
Ezekiel Elliott was the best RB in the NFL this year. If he retired tomorrow, should he make the HOF? TD was the best for one season. He had 3 really good years but only one you could call him the best. In the other years, he wasn’t the best. Barry Sanders was. It wasn’t close. Kurt Warner, the same. In one season you could argue the best. The other 3, he was competing against Brett Favre and Peyton Manning. He wasn’t close to the best. Then there is the whole, “level of talent around them” argument. How many “nobody” backs came after TD to the Broncos and looked almost as good? Several. Who was Kurt throwing to? Oh yeah, Isaac Bruce (HOF finalist) and Torry Holt (HOF), then Larry Fitzgerald (will be in HOF). When he had average talent around him, he was average, at best.
As to Morten, yes, I guess quantity is the argument but I have watched a lot of football. He was NEVER the best in any particular season. Still, if quantity is the argument, Dawkins played a lifetime for the type of player and position.
I think that Warner coming back from the dead and bringing the Cardinals, a traditionally losing franchise, to the edge of a Super Bowl title gets him over the top.
When Warner had average talent around him he was atrocious. 8-23 as a starter from 2002-2006.
Morten Andersen was literally the kicker on 2 all decade teams.
Yeah, never the best kicker. That measly points record is pure volume. Its not like he had a leg and holds the record for most 50+ kicks made overall, in a season AND in a single game. Wait, he does.
Only problem with mort is his atrocious kicking percentage. 62% on all kicks over 39 yards. And, that’s not from attempting a bunch of 55+ yarders. On kicks from 40-49 yards out he was 66%, from 50 and up 46%. Conversely, someone like Vinatieri is 81% on FGs over 39 yards, 67% on FGs over 50.
In fact, since all his records are overall number stats like total FGs made, total 50+ FGs made, etc … I think it’s pretty easy to make the argument that his records are pure volume.
That argument could also be made for Jerry Rice who literally played 5 more seasons than Owens and Moss.
It does not take anything away from the production, that a player was able to maintain an incredible level of play longer than other players, its actually the opposite. Especially at a position like Kicker, where the mental aspect is huge and we literally see kickers loose their confidence and leave the league in weeks. Remember when Blair Walsh and Greg the Leg were rookie kickers and basically the best in the league. Walsh was cut and Zuerlein is not particularly safe from what im reading.
No it absolutely cannot be made for Jerry Rice. Sure he has better overall stats like career yards and receptions because he played longer. That’ll happen. But, Jerry wasn’t a guy who had 50 catches a year for 700 yards for 30 years. He also led the league in receiving years in 6 separate seasons, led the league in TD recs 6 separate seasons, went over 1000 yards receiving 14 times including an absurd 11 times in a row. Compare that to Morten Anderson who, in a 25 year career led the league in made FGs in only 1 of those season with 28 and led the league in FG% in only 1 out of his 25 seasons. It’s actually tough to make a case that in any of his 25 seasons he was the best kicker in the league. Where as Jerry Rice was clearly the best WR in the league without question for at least 10 of his playing seasons.
Also let’s look at the idea that Rice playing an additional 5 years is the difference between he and Moss/TO:
Total TDs:
Rice – 208 (21 in last 5 years)
Moss – 157
TO – 156
You’d have to erase Rices last 10 years in the league before Moss and TO beat him out.
Receptions
Rice – 1549
Moss – 982
TO – 1078
You’d have to erase Rices last 9 years in the league before either Moss or TO beat him
Yards
Rice – 22895
TO – 15934
Moss – 15292
Again, need to erase his last 9 years in the league to make it close.
Rice played 5 more seasons than TO and 4 more seasons than Moss.
Cody Parker.
Morts best ever FG percentage for a season ranks 131st all time. His career FG percentage ranks him 51st all time.
He also holds or did hold most 50+ yards fgs in career, season and games.
Some of his records are just not for playing in the most games in the nfl.
Remember he was drafted before Reggie white. Comparing fg% from almost 40 years ago is stupid
Ezekiel Elliot looked good for one season, during an era when RBs aren’t the focal points of either offenses (so there isn’t much competition for him) and defenses (because it’s known that the passing game is much more damaging) behind the best line in the league. I don’t think he belongs in this argument.
I think the argument that Barry Sanders may have been better than TD actually shows the plane that TD was operating on. Among the very best and most devastating weapons to play the position. Therefore deserving to be in the hall.
On to Warner:
I’m not going to argue that he had a better career than Peyton and Favre, but he was definitely operating on their level at that time. He had good players around him, but so did most QBs who put up top numbers. Peyton had just as much talent around him, and Favre’s supporting cast wasn’t too crappy, either.
Warner was a video game QB when he was on. Like A-Rod.
I agree. Davis especially. He only had 3 really good years. After his injury he was nonfunctional. Those three years were really good. But, I don’t think they were otherworldly enough to get him into the hall.
Kurt I can make a better case for. People forget that even though he started late, he still ended up having a 12 year career. The numbers that he put up with those St Louis teams were unheard of at the time. And, he continued to be a great QB until the end getting the Cardinals back to the Super Bowl. The thing that kills it for me though is the 5 year span from 2002-2006 where he went 8-23 as a starter with 27 TDs and 30 INT. Get out of here. How can you have a span of 5 years in the middle of your career where you’re literally atrocious and still be a HOFer. The problem with Kurt is that he was only ever amazing when he had a ridiculously good supporting cast. Whenever he lacked multiple HOFers around him he was down right shitty.
I wouldn’t call him shitty, he was mediocre during those middle years. He was brought in to groom Eli when he was with the Giants and to some extent Leinart too when he was supposedly a stopgap for the Cardinals. He was injury prone and a late bloomer so people gave up on him really easily. Yea he had good talent at WR for most of his great years, there’s no denying that. But what choice did he have? It’s not like he forced a trade to a team that he thought would be good. He was a UDFA that made the Rams team. I doubt many teams believed in him anymore after his injury history and his brief time with the Giants. To blame him for talent around him that he didn’t ask for is rather silly. It’s not like he was Lebron or something. He took some bad teams and turned them around.
The funky thing with Warner is that he could have been 3-0 and 0-3 in his Super Bowl appearances. He edged out the Titans by an inch. He lost to the Cheatriots after Vinatieri booted his second win away. He almost came back against the Steelers (who were the better team) after throwing a pick 6. Albeit, you can also blame Warner for contributing to those loses by turning the ball over at crucial times.
I think Anderson has the points record?
He does, until Vinatieri breaks it and basically owns all the records for kicking from 50+ yards because of his consistency in being able to make them. Very few kickers were as trusted from that range for that long.
Denied? It’s NE that will be denied!
Julio Jones has 150 yds receiving and three tds. Falcons 34 Pats 24.
Eric Rowe can make Howie eat crow big-time if he plays well against Julio.
Hell would freeze over thrice if Rowe does well against Julio alone.
Agreed, but I don’t see that happening. I think Julio is going to run wild through the NE secondary, which includes our ol’ friend, Patrick Chung.
You need to finger our DC, who wants only feisty CBs. If Jim wanted to keep him, you think Howie would have said “no, I gotta get a conditional 4th from a team likely to be drafting in the 30’s to reduce our CB depth”?
https://twitter.com/profootballtalk/status/828265148993388544
Belichick will have the interns pinky by tonight.
Photo has been released. Odds are, the Empire knows the Atlanta playbook.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4cd5d2a7e04a89f02f099cbf83961dada23eee92a69194f548c5c6b4857a5a3b.jpg
You are the winner of the internet today.
Heh. Man, that thing looks awesome almost thirty years later.
Probably from the remaster.
Off topic…but did anybody see the video of Cousins shoving a volunteer ref at a Charity flag football game? Watch the video, this wasn’t some silly shenanigans. Quite a scumbag move.
link?
http://uproxx.com/sports/kirk-cousins-shoves-flag-football-referee/
Not surprised that Dawk didn’t get in because they are only have a few safeties in the HOF and Dawk also played at the same time as other former greats Reed and Palomu from PITT. T.O. Should be in without question but he’s not because he’s a nutjob that sold all his QBs down the river. He’s an A S S HOLE.
So if you’re an A-hole you can’t be in the pro football hall of fame, but you can be the President of the United States.
Sounds completely logical
The A-Hole TO should be in and I’m glad the A-Hole Trump won too. Get over it, liberal loser.
Go Falcons.
Go Pats
Anyone else stuck watching the game not with friends?
I’m at work, but I wouldn’t say I’m working. I’ve got one TV set to the game and two small ones on the puppy bowl.
That’s how one avoids getting flagged for roughing the Tom Brady. Drive his own OL into him.
I guess we have to deal with more Media Mike complaints about Cam’s commercial… What a thug, right?
TD was awesome at his peak but he has no business in the HOF. You don’t put in players who were really only great for a 3 or 4 year stretch.
Those mid-80s Seahawks teams had some really great talent but never could seem to get out of their own way including their QB (Dave Krieg)
Patrick Chung made a play. Oh wow.
And then gave up the TD. All is back to normal.
Chung!!!
I realize, the Atlanta offense will get all the attention. But the MVP so far is the entire Falcons defense. They are playing well.
They have really good team speed on Defense. They have been flying around all post seasons
Too many flags. Like one too many.
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
oof. Nobody was even covering Edleman. Terrible decision by Brady.
He’s been getting hit every other play
Couldn’t happen to a better guy.
Hit again lol
Pick 6 was the game. No Gronk and not enough weapons for the Pats
Like the good ole days when the NFC team would whoop the AFC team with a commanding lead by half time
Brady is getting hit. He doesn’t like that at all.
Blah. Bennett catches passes not even throw to him. Compare that to our guys.
Our guys would have batted the ball into a defenders hands for a pick 6.
You give them way too much credit. Our guys would never have turned their head since they never expect the ball anyway. At best it would have bounced of a surprised Ags helmet for a pick 6.
I think DGB is the guy who lets the ball hit him in the facemask
Been such a blah game so far and doesn’t have a good MVP candidate either yet.
Commercials haven’t been much better.
You must have missed the commercial where Coke ended racism. Air BnB would have ended it, but Coke already did.
I missed that one :(.
There was a Christopher Walken commercial. Always good.
Eric Rowe.
https://twitter.com/CTowersCBS/status/828406891546042369
Lumber 84 commercial- There’s gotta be an easier way to source your lumber than that, guys.
I miss the SB shows with more than 1 performer
PA amber alert
No shot that Atlanta lets this slip away …Pats look wiped out and over matched. .. legarret Blunt may never see the field again
How many ex-Eagles are out there? I count 3: Rowe, Chung, and Lewis. Am I missing anyone?
Amendola
God dammit, Rowe.
They should have went deep, Rowe would have been torched.
It looked like Julio had a step on his guy down the right sideline.
I didn’t know our WRs were playing for the Patriots today.
They have had problems with drops at times this year
Are you sure that’s not Agholor and Matthews just wearing foundation out there?
Yep… They lined up correctly didn’t they?
Oh right..you have a point now.
No clear mvp so far
… giving it to Ryan wud be soooooo lame
Alford?
When in doubt give it to the guy with the pick 6.
Only other option would be the guy who got the pick 6. But if it’s a comeback, no question that it’s not Brady.
Falcons D Line
Nope. It’s Matt Ryan.
LOL Malcolm Butler got ate up with that move.
Tevin Coleman and Freeman. Thats a nasty RB roatation
Would have to get Freeman if he leaves for FA.
We should be able to find a back in this draft(Marlon mack) and we still have Smallwood and Marshall. I hope we dont need to dip into FA for a RB
Ehh maybe Smallwood could grow but Marshall is always going to be a complementary piece. I don’t really want to take a RB unless it’s the top 3 guys this year. I think there’s better value in later round RBs/WRs than RBs this year.
Lots of good RBs in this draft. No need to take one in the first. I think they will find a starter if they want one.
I think WR drops off after Williams/Davis and again after Ross
Going to disagree with you on that. The RB class got less deep when some guys didn’t declare. A lot of complementary RBs are there but none of them have starter potential after Mixon + Kamara.
So, kinda looks like Atlanta’s going to win. Does anybody care?
Once Dallas got eliminated (which is good), I didn’t really have any other rooting interests here. I don’t dislike the Patriots particularly.
I care to the extent that the Patriots lose.
Yes. I hate the Patriots.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhDtFnpNOfE
How Belichick must feel right now.
Falcons just blew a chance to put this completely away with that field position.
lol @ Chung.
Did he just kick that receiver to tag him down?
Grady Jarrett MVP.
Maybe. Good suggestion.
And we have a game.
Uh oh..
Holy shit, Julio.
Wow, Julio.
I want that guy.
Run ball. Eat Clock. Kick Figgie.
And as I type that you take a stupid, stupid, McNabb-worthy sack. Bonehead.
The one thing they couldnt do
That and a hold. Oh wait…
Choke job
Well this is our blueprint friends. Get your franchise qb, keep putting pieces around him and you’ll get your shot (likely against the patriots)
ALT trying hard to not win
I think they’re going to lose.
They deserve too
Have we had an OT Superbowl before?
We’re about to find out
Holy shit
I wonder if Jake Matthews and Jalen Collins are dead men in Atlanta?
Why are you bothering to clock it?
How to beat Brady, lead 45-0 by 3rd quarter.
Or stop playing not to lose
Dammit.
RIP Falcons.
Shit, what happened? I didn’t even watch the 2nd half.
The comeback and choke of a lifetime.
Turned into the Eagles
I hate these overtime rules. College football or even soccer’s overtime rules should be the guide.
Matt Ryan will go down with one of the biggest choke artists in NFL history.
That entire team choked.
Their defense looked like ours under Chip. They were on the field too long.
The holding calls eventually stopped and turned into actual gains. Doesn’t help that the offense scored too fast and then choked away their last chance of getting any points.
Dan Quinn has to look at himself hard in the mirror and wonder if he should hire a coordinator. The last 2 quarters were terrible.
This wasn’t about Ryan choking as much as arguably the greatest NFL player & team doing their thing in the 2nd half.
The Pats can’t win without Ryan choking.
Greatest 2nd half of a Super Bowl ever. Brady is the greatest ever and this game just ended that debate.
Yeah, he was always up there, but he just took everyone else out of the conversation
but is he elite? makes u think
Elite?
He’s still a cheating asshole though. No amount of Superbowl wins will change that.
Maybe tells you something about the mindset of someone obsessed with winning?
No, it just tells me he’s a cheater and that rules don’t apply to him.
or cheating to win
He’s going to play for another 3-4 years too supposedly. Damn.
Yup. Rumor is he wants to play to 44 or 45.
Arguably might do it too. He lives like a Franciscan monk who is a zealot when it comes to diet, exercise, and training.
After this, I would argue he is the one, if not, the greatest professional athlete in US history. Nobody has done what he has done at his age.
He undoubtedly is. I think age is going to catch up to his arm eventually but Brady is a guy who can reinvent himself. He even ran for a damn first down at his age.
4-game suspension was the best thing that could have happened to Brady this year.
Pats still went 3-1, he avoided a month of wear and tear, and was fresh for the playoffs especially with the bye & 2 weeks between the Conference Game and Super Bowl.
Serenea Williams had a good week last week.
See George Blanda.
DICKHEAD LOSER
Gag. Hurl.
Ate some major crow and the betters who took the Pats at 12-1 entering the 2nd half made some serious money.
Second down pass by Atlanta with chance to ice the game had to be worst playcall ever
Nah. It was aggressive and, yes, should have been run-ball, eat-clock. However, Matty Ice needs to keep his cool and throw it away in that situation. Don’t take the sack.
And, off the top of my head, Doug’s lateral call against the Cowboys this season was worse.
And Seattle calling pass on the goal line in the Superbowl, when the Pats had no answer for Marshawn Lynch.
Yup should have tossed it away but who knows if Jake Matthews would have held the next play? The sequence of every worst possible scenario happened on that drive.
It did. That sequence changed the game. Pats made plays, Falcons made mistakes. But we’ve seen worse play calls.
Yeah, you have to trust your QB to not do the one thing he really can’t do — he’s got to throw that one away. Cannot take the sack. They were still in FG range, barely, but then if anything else goes wrong (hold) you are screwed.
The lateral call was probably a worse play call (though it only risked losing a few yards instead of 12, and would keep the clock rolling). But really, if Doug had just gone ahead and kicked the field goal that would have been a wash. So to me the (by far) worst play call was the decision to punt on the next play.
But it was really just about the same situation — the game was in hand with a FG, and the team was within FG range, so boring play calls from there on out probably win the game. The Falcons today and the Eagles earlier in the year made riskier play calls than necessary, and paid.
it will rank right up there, that coach will kick himself from now on
Eric Rowe, Superbowl champion.
Added to the list with Evan Mathis.
But at least we get a 4th round pick ina couple of years. Maybe then we can sign Rowe as a free agent.
Depends if Howie is still the GM and Schwartz the DC by then
Patrick Chung, Superbowl champion.
2 time Super Bowl champion
You’d think his time with the Eagles would have jinxed him from repeating.
Good. Season’s over. We can move on to the 2017 season. I feel its gonna be our year.
I so wanted Brady and Belicheck to turn full ‘heel’ tonight with Brady grabbing the Lombardi Trophy out of Goddell’s hands before he was finished, hitting him with it to knock him over, and stating he was the ‘greatest ever and that everyone should be so fortunate to witness his greatness.’
Jumping up on the stage with a folding chair, that would make it the best
That would have worked well too. Smashed Goddell in the face while he was mid-speech, knock him out cold, and then picked up the Lombardi Trophy to say he was glad Goddell brought back what rightfully belonged to him while going on a ‘heel’ tirade speech.
Kraft just gave the middle finger to Goodell.
Yup.
Dorenbos sighting, chilling with Belichick …odd
You couldn’t pay me enough to get me to talk to a reporter after a loss like that.
I can already imagine an anti-Cam narrative shaping up somehow.
Cam was sulking w 6 minutes to go. . Cam can never ever evet hold bradys jock strap… but ooooo he’s a big badasss
I think Brady won.
The footage of Blank cheering on the sidelines w 6 min to go and then his mile long face is all time
Focus on the positive guys: at least it wasn’t the Cowboys.
I’ll admit though if the Cowboys would’ve lost like the Falcons, I would also be satisfied.
https://twitter.com/MacEngelProf/status/828466700324655104
One unmentioned reason why Dawk would be bypassed: The years that AR’s squad made it into the playoffs, the defense, under the scheming genius of Jim Johnson was always central to their seasonal records. AR had the reputation of an “offense guy”, but Johnson’s defense was a rock compared to a predictable and often sporadic offense. The losses that were incurred in conference championships were NOT ALWAYS (read Carolina) but usually, a very good QB making us pay for the blitzing that our D thrived on. So if the D comes up a drive short in a playoff game, the D’s best player will get stigmatized. It’s BS, and he should still get there, but that’s my take.